By Stephen Zogopoulos, USNN World News
The recent issuance of presidential pardons by former President Joe Biden to family members and high-profile figures, including Liz Cheney and Anthony Fauci, has ignited a firestorm of controversy. Critics argue that these individuals, allegedly involved in crimes against humanity, have been shielded from accountability, undermining the very foundation of justice. This article examines whether such pardons render the recipients untouchable and explores alternative avenues for holding them accountable.
The Scope of Presidential Pardons
A presidential pardon is one of the broadest powers granted under Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. It allows the president to absolve individuals of federal crimes, effectively erasing their legal liability for those offenses. However, this power is limited to federal jurisdiction and does not extend to state or international laws.
Are Pardons Absolute?
While a pardon erases federal criminal liability, it does not equate to an exoneration. Acknowledging guilt is often a prerequisite for receiving a pardon, which means the actions in question are still a matter of record. Moreover, the power to pardon does not extend to civil liability. Victims or affected parties may pursue civil suits, holding the individuals financially accountable for their actions.
State and International Avenues
The doctrine of dual sovereignty allows states to prosecute individuals for crimes that violate state laws, even if a federal pardon has been issued. For instance, if evidence surfaces that Cheney or Fauci committed acts falling under state statutes, those states can pursue charges independently of federal pardons.
Internationally, crimes against humanity fall under the jurisdiction of bodies like the International Criminal Court (ICC). The United States is not a party to the ICC, but cooperation between international and domestic courts can circumvent the protective scope of a pardon, particularly in cases involving human rights violations.
The Nuremberg Code and Anthony Fauci
The Nuremberg Code, established after World War II, provides ethical guidelines for medical experimentation on human subjects. It mandates voluntary consent, prohibits unnecessary suffering, and emphasizes the prioritization of participant safety.
Critics of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s involvement in pandemic-related policies and research argue that his alleged support of gain-of-function research and the handling of public health mandates may violate these principles. For example, if evidence suggests that gain-of-function research was conducted without adequate consent or safeguards, and if such research contributed to the global spread of COVID-19, he could theoretically be held accountable under the tenets of the Nuremberg Code.
While a presidential pardon may absolve him of federal crimes, such allegations could still be pursued in international courts or through civil suits, particularly if the actions had global ramifications violating human rights.
Ethical and Political Accountability
Beyond legal repercussions, public figures remain vulnerable to ethical and political consequences. Congressional investigations, public hearings, and the court of public opinion can apply significant pressure, tarnishing reputations and careers.
A Call for Reform?
The controversy surrounding these pardons raises questions about the unchecked nature of presidential clemency. Should limitations be imposed to prevent the misuse of this power? Proposals such as requiring congressional approval for pardons in cases involving crimes against humanity may warrant serious consideration.
Closing Thoughts
While a presidential pardon offers substantial protection, it is not a blanket shield from accountability. The legal, ethical, and political pathways to justice remain viable, ensuring that even those who wield power are not above the law. Whether the nation will pursue these avenues with vigor remains to be seen.
Disclaimer
This article represents the opinions and views of Stephen Zogopoulos, CEO of USNN World News Corporation. The assertions within are based on his analysis and perspective and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of USNN World News as an organization or its affiliates.
Discover more from USNN World News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.