By Zachary Stieber
Over 50 officials in President Joe Bidenâs administration across a dozen agencies have been involved with efforts to pressure Big Tech companies to crack down on alleged misinformation, according to documents released on Aug. 31.
Senior officials in the U.S. government, including White House lawyer Dana Remus, deputy assistant to the president Rob Flaherty, and onetime White House senior COVID-19 adviser Andy Slavitt, have been in touch with one or more major social media companies to try to get the companies to tighten rules on allegedly false and misleading information on COVID-19, and take action against users who violate the rules, the documents show.
In July 2021, for instance, after Biden said that Facebook was âkilling peopleâ by not combating misinformation effectively, an executive at Meta reached out to Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, a Biden appointee, to say that government and Meta teams met after the remarks âto better understand the scope of what the White House expects from us on misinformation going forward.â
The same executive later wrote to Murthy saying, âI wanted to make sure you saw the steps we took just this past week to adjust policies on what we are removing with respect to misinformation, as well as steps taken to further address the âdisinfo dozen,ââ including removing pages linked to the group.
The White House publicly pressured social media companies to take action against a group officials dubbed the âdisinformation dozen,â which a nonprofit claimed were producing the bulk of âanti-vaccine misinformationâ on the platforms. Also in July 2021, Murthy said Facebook had not done enough to combat misinformation.
Rob Flaherty, director of digital strategy for the White House, told Slavitt and others in April 2021Â that White House staff would be briefed by Twitter âon vaccine misinfo,â with the meeting including âways the White House (and our COVID experts) can partner in product work,â according to one of the messages.
In another exchange that year, a Department of Treasury official working on âmis, dis, and mal-informationâ told Meta workers that the deputy treasury secretary wanted to talk about âpotential influence operations.â
In a text in February 2021, meanwhile, U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Director Jen Easterly, wrote to another agency official that she was âtrying to get us in a place where Fed can work with platforms to better understand the mis/dis trends so relevant agencies can try to prebunk/debunk as useful.â
The documents were part of a preliminary production in a lawsuit levied against the government by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, later joined by experts maligned by federal officials.
âIf there was ever any doubt the federal government was behind censorship of Americans who dared to dissent from official Covid messaging, that doubt has been erased,â Jenin Younes, a lawyer with the New Civil Liberties Alliance who is representing some of the plaintiffs in the case, said in a statement. âThe shocking extent of the governmentâs involvement in silencing Americans, through coercing social-media companies, has now been revealed.â
âCensorship Enterpriseâ
Plaintiffs said the massive pressure campaign amounted to a âCensorship Enterpriseâ because it involved so many officials and agencies.
Government lawyers only identified 45 officials at five agenciesâthe Department of Homeland Security, CISA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Murthyâs officeâwho communicated with social media companies on misinformation, but documents they produced showed others were involved, including officials at the Census Bureau and the Departments of Treasury and State.
Responses from the Big Tech companies also revealed more officials involved with the effort.
Meta has disclosed that at least 32 federal officials, including top officials at the White House and the Food and Drug Administration, were in communication with it about content moderation. Many of the officials were not identified in the response by the government.
YouTube disclosed 11 officials not disclosed by the government and Twitter identified nine, including senior officials at the State Department.
âThe discovery provided so far demonstrates that this Censorship Enterprise is extremely broad,â plaintiffs said, adding later that âit rises to the highest levels of the U.S. Government, including numerous White House officials.â
Additionally, the FBI was not identified even though the agency recently said, after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed that the bureau reached out before the 2020 election, that it routinely issues communications to social media companies.
More discovery is needed to uncover the full breadth of the pressure campaign, plaintiffs told the judge overseeing the case.
âWhen the federal government colludes with Big Tech to censor speech, the American people become subjects rather than citizens,â Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, a Republican, said in a statement. âThe [U.S. Department of Justice] must not be allowed to hide behind the veil of executive privilege, especially when there is already compelling evidence that the peopleâs government colluded with these social media companies to suppress their right of free speech.â