Emergency Petition Filed in Major Biden Admin Social Media Censorship Case
Emergency Petition Filed in Major Biden Admin Social Media Censorship Case

By Jack Phillips

The attorneys general for Missouri and Louisiana have submitted a petition to oppose the Biden administration’s motion to stay an injunction against its efforts allowing it to contact social media firms about a range of online content, including its efforts to flag so-called misinformation.

Over the weekend, the two states filed (pdf) a memorandum of opposition to the administration’s motion, coming days after a federal judge partially granted an injunction that blocks various Biden administration officials and government agencies such as the Justice Department and the FBI from working with big tech firms to censor posts on social media. It came in response to a lawsuit filed by the attorneys general, who accused the White House and various federal agencies of putting pressure on social media firms to take down posts or suspend accounts.

“Evidence in this case overwhelmingly shows that the way the Government supposedly ‘prevents grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes’ is to pressure and induce social-media platforms to censor disfavored viewpoints on COVID-19, elections, and other core political speech,” they argued on Sunday.

“In the end, their position is fundamentally defiant toward the Court’s judgment,” they added. “It demonstrates that the Government will continue violating First Amendment rights by censoring core political speech on social media as soon as it can get away with it. The motion to stay should be denied.”

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that the Biden administration must cease contacting social media companies about a broad range of online content, including the administration’s efforts to flag alleged misinformation. The judge said some of the administration’s past communications with social media companies violated the First Amendment, and said that during the pandemic the government “assumed a role similar to an Orwellian Ministry of Truth.”

Judge Terry A. Doughty of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana wrote on July 4 that the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, the Department of Justice, and the enters for Disease Control and Prevention cannot take a range of actions targeting social media posts, companies, and users of the platform.

Several officials are specifically named in the order, including Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Surgeon General Vivek H. Murthy; White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, and others.

The social media companies that were included in the lawsuit include Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and WhatsApp, as well as Chinese Communist Party-linked TikTok and WeChat, among other platforms. The Republican attorneys general brought their lawsuit against the administration in 2022, accusing the government of trying to censor conservative viewpoints.

The ruling marked a win for Republicans who sued the Biden administration, saying it was using the COVID-19 pandemic and the threat of alleged misinformation as an excuse to target views that went outside the mainstream narrative.

“This could be arguably one of the most important First Amendment cases in modern history,” Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry  told The Epoch Times’ “American Thought Leaders” in an interview after the ruling.

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre speaks during a press briefing at the White House in Washington on June 26, 2023. She was among those who were named in the lawsuit and order. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)

“If you look at the opinion that the judge lays out, he takes from our argument that this is basically one of the most massive undertakings of the federal government to limit American speech in the history of our country,” Mr. Landry, a Republican, added. “The things that we uncovered, in this case, should be both shocking, appalling, and concerning for all Americans.”

Last week, the DOJ filed an appeal of the ruling and sought to lift the injunction in a filing made to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Previously, U.S. officials have claimed they were aiming to tamp down alleged misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines to curb preventable deaths, which has long been decried by free speech advocates, conservatives, and doctors who promote alternative therapies for COVID-19.

At the same time, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters on July 5 that the Biden administration “certainly disagrees with this decision” and will “continue to promote responsible actions to protect public health, safety, and security when confronted by challenges like a deadly pandemic and foreign attacks on our election.”

“Our view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take action or to take account of the effects of their platforms are having to the American people but make independent choices about the information they present. They are a private, as you know, entity, and it is their responsibility to—you know, to act accordingly. And so, we’re going to continue to be responsible in that way,” Ms. Jean-Pierre added.

Tom Ozimek contributed to this report.

USNN World News (USNN) USNN World News Corporation is a media company consisting of a series of sites specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information, local,...