USNN World News

Opinion

Cultural Revolution 1966 v. 2020

by USNN2020December 11, 2020September 8, 2024

Opinion

Rage Mobs 1966 v. 2020

by USNN2020December 11, 2020September 8, 2024

Opinion

The Cult of Mao 1966 v. 2020

by USNN2020December 11, 2020May 23, 2025

Opinion

Case for President Trump Invoking Insurrection Act to Restore Election Integrity

by USNN2020December 9, 2020June 14, 2025

Opinion

Overwhelming Evidence of Outcome-Altering Voting Irregularities

by USNN2020December 9, 2020January 12, 2021

Opinion

The ‘Move On’ Chorus Needs to Deal With the Facts of the Election

by USNN2020December 8, 2020February 26, 2025

Opinion

This Election Puts Corruption of the Media on Full Display

by USNN2020December 7, 2020June 13, 2025

Opinion

Bill Gates Admits COVID Vaccine Changes DNA, Now Doctors Rebel!

by USNN2020December 6, 2020January 30, 2025

Opinion

How Pro-Beijing Communists Almost Stole the Election for Joe Biden—the Old-Fashioned Way

by USNN2020December 4, 2020November 22, 2025

Commentary Attorney General William Barr signaled on Tuesday that he has washed his hands of the president. He told the media that the Department of Justice has found no evidence of fraud that would change the election results in favor of Donald Trump. U.S. officials I spoke with do not understand Barr’s motivation for speaking to a press corps typically hostile to him as well as Trump. “There’s no evidence that the DOJ spoke with any of the numerous witnesses with first-hand knowledge of election fraud,” said one senior official. “And many people reached out directly to the FBI and got no response back.” The effect of Barr’s statement is to derail the Trump campaign’s efforts to reverse the vote in battleground states contested by the president’s legal team. It is difficult to imagine state legislatures or courts taking up the campaign’s cause when the headlines show that Trump’s own attorney general says nothing is wrong. By distancing himself from the president’s political fortunes, Barr gave his bona fides as an honest broker in order to resolve the issue that most matters to him—salvaging the reputation of the institution he’s led twice, the Justice Department. He revealed Tuesday that he’d appointed John Durham special counsel to continue his nearly two-year-long probe into the origins of Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI’s discredited investigation of the 2016 Trump campaign. According to Barr, the scope of the investigation he asked the U.S. attorney from Connecticut to lead in May 2019 has “narrowed considerably.” At first, it seemed sprawling. The two men reportedly traveled to Italy and contacted officials in the United Kingdom and Australia to gather information on foreign nationals allegedly involved in Crossfire Hurricane. In August, Durham interviewed former CIA director John Brennan for eight hours. In September, the prosecutor reportedly sought information on the FBI’s investigation of the Clinton Foundation. Republican officials reasoned that it was precisely because the investigation was so large and thorough that it was taking Durham so much time to deliver indictments. Reports claimed that he kept finding new evidence, was following more leads. On Tuesday, Barr said Durham’s work now “really is focused on the activities of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation within the FBI.” Perhaps Barr believes that limiting the investigation’s scope will convince a Biden White House that it does not threaten his administration. After all, a thorough investigation would have to look at Biden’s pick for National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan. What did the former Hillary Clinton campaign advisor know about the FBI’s role in the anti-Trump operation when he was briefing the press on “collusion” and tweeting out stories sourced to Clinton contractor and FBI source Christopher Steele? What did John Kerry, Biden’s choice for climate envoy, do with Steele’s Trump-Russia reports when they were passed to him as secretary of state? And why did then-Vice President Biden direct the FBI to look at Trump’s national security advisor Michael Flynn for violating the Logan Act? There’s nothing to stop Biden from dismissing Durham. Trump reportedly considered firing Robert Mueller at least twice. But the president’s legal team defended the probity of the coup targeting their client. “I would never have anything to do with any attempts to attack Bob Mueller’s integrity,” said the former spokesman for the White House’s legal team, Mark Corallo. In other words, the aides hired to defend Trump were less concerned with the stability of the U.S. government than the prospect that their reputations would be trashed in the press. A Biden administration will be lauded by the media for disarming a weapon dangerous to “democracy” if—when—Durham is fired, and any charges made are withdrawn. But the only Americans likely to be shocked by a cover-up of that magnitude are Trump voters. And they are no longer capable of being shocked by the corruption of the Democratic Party and its media partners after watching, for example, the press bury news of the Biden family’s financial ties to a Chinese regime responsible for a pandemic that left hundreds of thousands of Americans dead and tens of millions unemployed. It’s not clear why Durham can make a case now that he wasn’t able to make in a year and a half. He was rumored to be concerned that bringing charges or releasing a report too close to the election would look like a political hit job, and the investigation, conducted by a career prosecutor proud of his reputation as a “straight-shooter,” had to be above reproach. Only self-regard blinded him to the irony—his discretion left the rule of law liable to the outcome of a political contest. The subject of his investigation—corruption at the highest levels of government—was all the evidence he needed that its integrity would depend entirely on a Trump victory. Failing to bring charges, or even filing a report, for interfering in the 2016 election, was an invitation to interfere in the 2020 race. If no one was held accountable for what they did four years ago, there was little risk this time out. And now Barr speaks out to downplay the Trump campaign’s claims of election fraud when it is precisely because of the actions and decisions taken by the institution he cherishes that half of America has lost its faith in the justice system as well as the electoral process. On such things much smaller than war hang the fate of nations. Lee Smith is the author of the recently published book, “The Permanent Coup: How Enemies Foreign and Domestic Targeted the American President.”

Opinion

Barr Fails to Salvage DOJ’s Reputation With Statements on Election Fraud

by USNN2020December 2, 2020January 12, 2021

Opinion

Trevor Loudon Says Election Outcome Will Decide Whether ‘Unfolding Socialist Revolution’ Is Beaten Back

by USNN2020December 1, 2020June 29, 2024

Opinion

Crime Hiding Crime: A Motive for Stealing the Election

by USNN2020December 1, 2020May 11, 2025

NATIONAL NEWS

Nadler schedules new impeachment hearing for ‘presentations of evidence’

By Brooke Singman | Fox News House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler has announced a new impeachment hearing for next week where committee lawyers will present evidence in ...

Trump threatens to have Schiff, Bidens, Pelosi testify in Senate trial as he dares House to impeach

By Brooke Singman | Fox News President Trump on Thursday challenged House Democrats to impeach him “fast” and ship the process over to the Senate, where he threatened to ...

Gingrich says it’s ‘almost a joke’ for Dems to claim Trump committed impeachable offenses

By Joshua Nelson | Fox News Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told “Fox & Friends” on Wednesday that the House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry has sunk so far below the ...

Matt Gaetz grills impeachment witnesses over Democratic donations, slams professor’s dig at Barron Trump

By Charles Creitz | Fox News House Judiciary Committee member Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., grilled three of the four impeachment panel witnesses for their past support for Democratic candidates, ...

Media outlets mum on Bloomberg News’ policy to investigate Trump, not Democrats, study shows

By Brian Flood | Fox News Bloomberg News’ controversial decision to investigate President Trump, but not his political opponents, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media, according to a ...

Martha MacCallum: Turley had a ‘powerful moment’ in his impeachment hearing testimony

By Nick Givas | Fox News Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley had a “powerful moment” during the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment hearings Tuesday when he said congressional Democrats will alienate half the country ...

Melania Trump: Lawyer who invoked Barron Trump’s name for laughs at impeachment hearing ‘should be ashamed’

By Morgan Phillips | Fox News First lady Melania Trump said Stanford Law Professor Pamela Karlan, who testified at Wednesday’s impeachment hearing, “should be ashamed” for invoking her 13-year-old son’s name as ...

Alleged ‘Whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella Worked Closely with Anti-Trump Dossier Hoaxer

By Aaron Klein Eric Ciaramella, whom Real Clear Investigations suggests is the likely so-called whistleblower, was part of an Obama administration email chain celebrating the ...

MASSIVE! TRUMP Campaign says Victoria Nuland & Whistleblower wrote STEELE DOSSIER! SWAMP TREMBLES!

Posted By Investment Watch Blog Trump 2020 advisor just stated to Harris Faulker on Outnumbered at FOX that Victoria Jane Nuland, former Assistant Secretary of ...

Pollak: Four Questions Republicans Should Ask Impeachment Experts at First Judiciary Hearing

By Joel B. Pollack The House Judiciary Committee will convene its first hearing in the impeachment inquiry on Wednesday, featuring four legal scholars who will ...

Survey: 1 in 5 Left-Leaning Bosses ‘Will Not Hire’ Trump Supporters

By Dr. Susan Berry A survey finds one in five left-leaning bosses “will not hire” job candidates who are supporters of President Donald Trump. In addition, ...

Adam Schiff Tells NPR Trump ‘Solicited a Bribe’; Report Ignores ‘Bribery’

Joel B. Pollack House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) told National Public Radio (NPR) on Tuesday that President Donald Trump was guilty of ...