Whistleblower Claims ABC and Kamala Harris Colluded to Sway Presidential Debate

By Stephen Zogopoulos, USNN World News

Washington, D.C. – In a bombshell revelation, a whistleblower has come forward with allegations that ABC News and Vice President Kamala Harris conspired to manipulate last week’s highly anticipated presidential debate. According to the whistleblower, who claims to have insider knowledge, ABC provided Harris with debate questions in advance, selectively fact-checked only the statements of former President Donald Trump, and permitted Harris to wear an earpiece for offstage assistance.

The debate, which garnered millions of viewers, was widely seen as pivotal in shaping public opinion ahead of the upcoming election. The whistleblower’s claims have set off a political firestorm, with Republicans calling for a formal investigation and Democrats dismissing the accusations as baseless.

Allegations of Debate Manipulation

The whistleblower, who has not yet been publicly identified but reportedly has connections to both the debate’s production team and campaign staff, alleges that Vice President Harris was given several key questions in advance, giving her time to prepare more thorough and polished responses. The whistleblower also claims that moderators from ABC News focused their fact-checking efforts solely on Donald Trump, while largely ignoring potential inaccuracies in Harris’s statements.

One of the most startling allegations is that Harris wore an earpiece during the debate, receiving directions and talking points from campaign aides. This practice, if true, would violate the rules of the debate and raise serious ethical concerns.

Calls for an Investigation

Republican lawmakers and Trump’s campaign team have called for a full investigation into the whistleblower’s claims. “If true, this is a stunning breach of public trust and the integrity of our democratic process,” said one Trump campaign official. “We demand transparency and accountability. The American people deserve a fair election.”

In contrast, Harris’s team and ABC News have vehemently denied the allegations. A spokesperson for Harris’s campaign called the whistleblower’s claims “desperate fabrications” and insisted that Harris adhered to all debate rules.

ABC News, which moderated the event, also issued a statement saying that their debate process is fair and unbiased, and any suggestions otherwise are “absurd and without merit.” They further emphasized their commitment to journalistic integrity and transparency.

Potential Political Fallout

While investigations into the whistleblower’s claims are still in the early stages, the accusations could have far-reaching consequences in the already charged political atmosphere. Legal experts have noted that, if proven, these actions could constitute violations of election ethics rules and could even lead to criminal charges.

Both campaigns have a significant amount at stake. For Trump, the allegations could re-energize his base, particularly those who have long been skeptical of the mainstream media. For Harris, these claims could undermine her credibility and overshadow her debate performance, just as polls showed her gaining momentum.

The whistleblower has reportedly provided documentation and recordings to support their claims, although these have yet to be independently verified.

Next Steps

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) and the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) have indicated they are reviewing the whistleblower’s accusations but have not commented on whether an official investigation will be launched.

For now, the public is left with more questions than answers, and the debate over the debate is likely to rage on in the weeks ahead.

As more details emerge, the potential for this controversy to reshape the 2024 election remains uncertain. Whether the whistleblower’s claims will lead to an official inquiry or fade into the backdrop of an already tumultuous election cycle is yet to be seen.

Disclaimer: The following news article is based on a whistleblower’s allegations and ongoing investigations. No conclusive evidence has been officially verified at this time, and all parties involved are presumed innocent until proven otherwise.